Industry News: Legal Management Updates
 

Thoughts on Transitioning to Retirement

After retiring earlier this year, longtime ALA member Paul Morton reveals his advice on planning for retirement, preparing the firm and transitioning leadership.

By Paul Morton
November 2025
 

“Know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em.” 

-Kenny Rogers, “The Gambler”

According to Kenny Rogers, it’s a question of timing, understanding your circumstances and keeping control. Planning for retirement is complicated with emotional, organizational and financial issues to consider. Assuming you care about your firm and leaving a legacy, the following are a few guidelines to consider: 

Understand the personal reasons governing when you should retire.  

  • Are you having increasing health challenges that need more attention and/or a reduction in stress, or are you healthy and want to take advantage of retirement?  
  • Are there family reasons? Maybe your spouse either has or is about to retire, or you have others you need to care for.  
  • Are financial circumstances impacting you? You may no longer need the salary because you’ve planned well and the stock market has been kind, or you may need a continuation of salary.  
  • You have plans about how to spend your retirement and want to start sooner: more time on the golf course, hobbies you haven’t focused on, pent up demand for travel or maybe just sleeping late. 
  • With changes in technology, economic, political or personnel demands on your firm, and laws and policies changing faster than ever before, it may be harder to stay on top of your game. 
  • Or maybe you’re just fed up with managing lawyers.  

Now that you’ve recognized why and when you want to retire, you need to look at your firm and your role.  

  • Are you viewed as a leader of the firm where your departure could be problematic, or are you seen as an employee where your departure would not be a blip?  
  • Are there others in the firm who could be trained to step into your position?  
  • What is the firm’s attitude toward retirement for its partners? Should that apply to you?  
  • Are your partners good at planning and making critical decisions?  
  • Strike a balance: Know whether your needs and timing can coincide with the firm’s needs while understanding how long the firm needs you. But protect yourself! “You’ve got to know when to hold ‘em, know when to “fold ‘em.”  
  • How does your firm historically treat departing people? Will they respect advanced planning, or will they feel offended that you’re thinking of leaving? Read the signs. “Know when to walk away, know when to run!” 

We had a “transition to retirement policy” for partners, which said you should start discussing your plans with firm leadership in the year in which you turn xx years old: when you wanted to retire, how you’d transition your clients and who you needed to train. I thought the same should apply to me, so I started the conversation three years in advance. After two years of reminders, I then said, “Okay guys, this is it. Time to start implementing a plan.”

Much of my joy at work came from teaching the next generation of managers and partners. See if there is an individual who has the right combination of skills and interest to take over. If so, how long would it take to train this individual? This can be an ideal approach if you have the right candidate, but depending on your role, the size of your firm and potential successors (and the willingness of your partners to accept a subordinate in a new, more senior role), this can also be a hard path to follow.

Know whether your needs and timing can coincide with the firm’s needs while understanding how long the firm needs you. 

When I planned for my retirement, firm leadership needed to determine what role they wanted the new administrator to play. They appointed a sub-committee to review the job description. What were their priorities? Communications, finance, HR, operations, law firm experience? The priorities would also be dependent on the strength of the support team of professional managers. The new person would not have the same experience and personality, so we needed room for them to “own” the position. We allowed several months for the sub-committee review.  

We considered internal candidates, the ALA network, other professional networks and recruiters. We established a small team, which included partners, our Chief Human Resources Officer and me, to review the resumes. This group would conduct initial interviews and then expand the team to include senior professional leaders and partners in leadership roles. This would take a few more months.  

Timing would be critical. How much overlap would be ideal? The incumbent would not want to be a lame duck for long, and you want the partners and staff to turn to the new person instead of following old habits. Timing should be discussed with the new hire. We presumed one to three months overlap. For the incumbent, “The secret to survivin’ is knowin’ what to throw away and knowin’ what to keep…” 

The last piece to consider is communication: the management of both the internal and external message. You do not want people jumping to the wrong conclusion about a change in senior leadership.  

So, how much time is right? I used two years to remind people that my retirement was coming; the real work took less than a year. As with everything else a good administrator touches, planning a retirement requires analysis, communication and time management, juggling people with mixed expectations, and trusting others to do things right. Then it’s time to say goodbye and proceed on to new challenges.

Also in This Issue

Back to Top