Industry News: Legal Management Updates
 

Is Your Law Firm’s Innovation Keeping Up?

Consider these perspectives from leading litigation support directors on what your law firm can do to stay ahead of the curve.
By Hilary Goldman
June 2025
 

As law firm administrators develop and implement plans to innovate in their organizations, they may be left wondering whether these changes put their firms ahead of the curve, merely help them keep up with their competitors or move the needle with clients. As the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) continues to grow, this year promises to be full of more headlines and buzz that will tempt law firm technology leaders to pursue the “next big thing.”

It's important for law firm administrators to have benchmarks and perspective as they determine how and where to innovate. A recent report by Ari Kaplan Advisors and Opus 2 sheds light on how top firms are using technology.

Many of the firms surveyed said they now realize that simply adopting and using technology is no longer sufficient to maintain a competitive edge when faced with the speed of innovation and increasing complexity of litigation. For example, while 70% of the survey participants use a dedicated case management system designed specifically for litigation, two-thirds of those respondents believe it’s time for them to upgrade, with many citing a diminishing competitive edge as a factor.

Rising Data Volumes and Caseloads

The report shows not only how data volumes and caseloads are increasing, but also how this change could impact the profitability of growing litigation teams.

The median number of cases the respondents manage in an average year is 200, and 83% expect their portfolio to grow in the next 12 to 18 months. But growth may be threatened by the increasing amount of time required to sift through data: 93% reported that the volume of data they manage for an average dispute is increasing, and nearly 60% say the continued growth of data volumes is a concern. At the same time, half of the participants say the number of documents, records or exhibits they use at trial remains the same, meaning that teams must dedicate more time to managing data to achieve the same results.

Litigation teams must have the right technology and resources in place to maintain momentum. As one participant noted, “Our technology can scale effectively, but the growth does present resource challenges.” In addition, it’s not just the growth in data, but the increase in diverse data sources that concerns leaders. “Growth does not scare me, but the continued introduction of new data types will likely become burdensome,” another participant said.

Outdated Technology Concerns

Because of the data deluge, legal teams need a scalable approach to case management to maintain an upward growth trajectory. But 30% of survey participants said their case management solution was more than 10 years old and described it as “inadequate,” making sustainable innovation almost impossible. One leader said of their current system: “Our lawyers would get the same benefit with Excel.”

Among the firms who reported using dedicated case management tools, 43% said they could save time if the firm invested in a more innovative solution, and 57% have evaluated case management tools in the past year. One respondent noted the advancement of GenAI integrated into case management would likely “enhance the experience and increase the potential engagement of users at a level to which they have not been accustomed.”

The drive to adopt technology that can support collaborative innovation and aligns with how litigation teams work together was echoed by one participant who said, “Since we collaborate so much, we need better and more modern tools.” It’s not just the litigation teams who expect innovation. “We have clients asking to integrate and collaborate, which is easier and often only possible in the cloud,” said another survey participant.

Adoption of Artificial Intelligence

Speaking of modern tools: 87% of the leaders surveyed said AI-assisted case management software is a competitive advantage, with half of participants saying their firms already use GenAI to support their litigation processes.

The survey found the most popular use cases for GenAI are:

  • Legal research

  • Coding for eDiscovery

  • Summarizing documents

  • Predicting how judges will rule

  • Interpreting filings

  • Calendaring

  • Drafting documents

The respondents say GenAI will have the most significant impact on document analysis, transcript management, chronology creation and case strategy.

87% of the leaders surveyed said AI-assisted case management software is a competitive advantage, with half of participants saying their firms already use GenAI to support their litigation processes.

One participant noted members of their team “are getting nervous and want to use [GenAI] because they are concerned about missing out.” Nearly all survey participants (90%) said they are developing protocols and guardrails to ensure ethical and effective use of GenAI. These are important proactive steps to tackle concerns head-on while fostering an innovative mindset. Said one survey participant: “We are using generative AI in creative ways that will be standard in a year or two.”

Innovation Opportunities and Challenges for Litigation Support

Beyond GenAI, litigation support leaders say they’re innovating and investing in: cloud migration, automated reporting and data management, active learning in eDiscovery, alternative legal services providers, streamlined transcriptions and translations, and chatbots.

While most respondents say their firms’ investment in technology and innovation is adequate or market-leading, some still face barriers to advancement. Half of the participants indicated that limited time for innovation is their most significant barrier to driving change in litigation support. The other factors were a lack of budget, difficulty achieving widespread adoption and minimal firm interest.

The findings from this report highlight a pivotal moment for law firms: Maintaining a competitive edge requires not just adopting technology but continuously innovating to address the increasing complexity of litigation. With rising caseloads and data volumes, outdated tools and processes risk stifling growth and profitability.

It’s more critical than ever to resist inertia. Firms that proactively pursue innovation — whether by leveraging generative AI, adopting best-in-class solutions or enhancing litigation support strategies — will be better positioned to evolve and flourish, no matter what challenges the future holds.

Also in This Issue

Back to Top